A Comparative Study of Overset and AMI Methods for Propeller Noise Prediction

Abstract:
This study investigates the use of the Overset mesh method for propeller simulations in OpenFOAM and compares it with the Arbitrary Mesh Interface (AMI) approach. While AMI is well validated for rotor aeroacoustics, it is limited in handling large relative motions and complex component interactions. In contrast, the Overset method enables flexible simulation of transition kinematics using overlapping grids, though its aeroacoustic capability in OpenFOAM has not been well established. A comparative analysis was conducted on a Joby-scale five-bladed propeller at an 80° tilt angle without a fairing, representing a transition-flight condition. Aerodynamic and acoustic predictions were obtained using hybrid DDES coupled with the Ffowcs Williams–Hawkings method. Results show that the Overset method provides improved agreement with experimental thrust and torque and captures stronger leading-edge vortices than AMI. Both methods resolve blade-vortex and blade-wake interactions. However, the Overset approach produces higher broadband noise due to stronger vortices and interpolation effects, while AMI yields smoother pressure fields and clearer tonal content. In the far field, AMI better matches experimental SPL trends. Overset shows larger first-BPF SPL errors (up to 22.5 dB vs. 5.7 dB for AMI), though OASPL differences remain small. Overall, Overset is less reliable for noise prediction and more computationally expensive.

Did you attend Forum 82? Click the preview below to access the full paper.